PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN BEBAS PADA TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA DEELNEMING
(Studi Putusan Nomor 114/PID.B/2020/PN.GST)
Abstract
An exoneration is a choice in regards to an individual's activities that the public examiner blames for being a lawbreaker act or not, however, which can't be legitimately and convincingly demonstrated in a preliminary. One of the quittance choices for criminal demonstrations of brutality that was concluded in court was choice number 144/Pid.B/2020/PN.Gst. In this choice, the respondent was associated with abusing Article 170, Article 212, and Article 351 of the Lawbreaker Code. The sort of exploration utilized is regulating legitimate examination utilizing legal methodology, case approach, relative methodology, and logical correlation. Information assortment was brought out utilizing auxiliary information obtained through library materials comprising essential legitimate materials, optional legitimate materials, and tertiary legitimate materials. The information investigation utilized is a distinct subjective examination, and determinations are made utilizing a logical technique. In light of examination discoveries and conversation, it tends to be reasoned that the adjudicator's contemplations are obligatory in a choice. For the situation (Investigation of Choice Number 114/Pid.B/2020/PN.Gst), in the appointed authority's thought in the choice of exoneration in criminal demonstrations of brutality carried out by deelneming choice Number 144/Pid.B/2020/PN.Gst, to be specific, the respondent's activities, which were charged by the public examiner with not being legitimately and convincingly demonstrated to have perpetrated a crook demonstration of savagery against the casualty as expressed in the third incrimination of Article 212 passage (1) Jo 55 Section (1) first of the Lawbreaker Code, which is Article 183 of the Lawbreaker Code to decide the wrongdoing against the litigant in light of his culpability. completed should be demonstrated with no less than two substantial bits of proof that can persuade the adjudicator. The creator proposes that the public examiner, while making charges at preliminary, ought to be more cautious in drafting his arraignment as per the proof. The public examiner ought to be more cautious and focus on equity for the respondent.
References
Anwar, Adang Yesmil 2010,Kriminologi Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Ardiansyah. 2018 “Upaya Hukum Kasasi Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana” Jurnal. Vol 2. No. 15
Arifman Febriyanto Saputra Zamili. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Studi Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/Pn.Mbn)Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Artis Duha , (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor 175/Pid.B/2020/Pn Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Atmasasmita, Romli 1992. Teori dan kapita selekta kriminolgi. Bandung: eresco.
Atozanolo Baene. 2022. Penerapan Hukum Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Yang Dilakukan Dalam Jabatan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus.Tpk/2017/Pn.Mdn). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Bahilma, Aisa Siti. 2020. “Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Secara Bersama- sama Dimuka Umum Ditinjau Menurut Hukum Pidana Islam Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 84/Pid.B/2020/PNMbo”
Bisman Gaurifa. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Edisama Buulolo. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 680/Pid.B/2016/Pn. Mlg) . Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Fau, A. D. (2022). Kumpulan Berbagai Karya Ilmiah & Metode Penelitian Terbaik Dosen Di Perguruan Tinggi. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fau, Amaano., D. (2022). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fitriani Duha. (2022). Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Secara Elektronik (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2290 K/Pid.Sus/2015) Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Harefa, A., D. (2022). Kumpulan Startegi & Metode Penulisan Ilmiah Terbaik Dosen Ilmu Hukum Di Perguruan Tinggi.
Harefa, Arianus. 2024 Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia Pasca Belakang. KUHP Nasional, Jawa Barat: CV Jejak.
Harefa, D, Dkk. (2023). Relationship Student Learning Interest To The Learning Outcomes Of Natural Sciences. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 4(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614
Harefa, Darmawan., D. (2023c). Teori perencanaan pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/teori-perencanaan-pembelajaran-GO5ZY.html
http://www.suduthukum.com/aspek pertimbangan hakim
Loi., S.,K.,R., (2024). Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan Secara Hukum Adat (Studi Di Desa Bawoganowo). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1474
Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html
Nehe.,M. (2024). Putusan Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Yang Mengakibatkan Luka Berat Dan Matinya Orang (Studi Putusan Nomor 451/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Jkt.Utr). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1930
Okerius Sisokhi, (2022). Analisis Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studiputusannomor 1002/Pid.B/2008/Pn.Smg). Angelama Lase. (2022)Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penjatuhan Hukuman Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat (Studi Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Gst. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Peraturan Rektor Universitas Nias Raya Nomor 6 Tahun 2021 tentang Panduan Penulisan Skripsi.
Prinst, Darwan. 2002. Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Praktik. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Putri Awin Susanti Zamili. (2022). Kewenangan Tni Angkatan Laut Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing (Studi Di Pangkalan Tni Al Nias). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Samosir, Djisman. 2013. Segenggam Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana Bandung: nuansa aulia.
Sarumaha, M. D. (2022). Catatan Berbagai Metode & Pengalaman Mengajar Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. Lutfi Gilang. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=8WkwxCwAAAAJ&authuser=1&citation_for_view=8WkwxCwAAAAJ:-f6ydRqryjwC
Sarumaha, Martiman S., D. (2023). Model-model pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/modelmodel-pembelajaran-0BM3W.html
Sudarto. 1986. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni
Syarifah Dewi Indawati. 2020 “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2. No. 1
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Waruwu., Y. (2024). Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyeludupan Manusia Di Bawah Ancaman Batas Minimum (Studi Putusan Nomor 483/Pid.Sus./2020/PN.Btm).Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1353
Yuniar Hati Laia (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor. 104/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Copyright (c) 2024 Herisman Zagoto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
