ANALISIS PERSPEKTIF GURU MATEMATIKA SMP DI KABUPATEN BOGOR TERHADAP STEM CHALLENGE SEBAGAI ASESMEN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the perspectives of junior high school mathematics teachers in Bogor Regency regarding the implementation of the STEM Challenge as an alternative assessment in mathematics learning. This research uses a qualitative approach with a phenomenological method. Data were collected through open-ended questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and document studies. The results of the study reveal three findings: (1) teachers assess that the STEM Challenge is quite appropriate and has the potential to assess students' abilities, especially related to 21st century skills such as critical thinking, creativity, communication, and collaboration; (2) many teachers realize that conventional assessments (written tests) have limitations as they tend to focus only on cognitive aspects; and the last, (3), although the STEM Challenge is considered a good alternative assessment, teachers also expressed Challenges and obstacles in its implementation, including limitations in infrastructure, lack of learning time, and the need for adaptation for teachers and students. This research recommends the need for policy support, teacher training, and the provision of resources so that the STEM Challenge can be effectively implemented in order to make assessments in mathematics learning more contextual and meaningful.
References
Alfansyur, A. (2020). Seni Mengelola Data: Penerapan Triangulasi Teknik Info Artikel Abstrak. 5(2), 146–150. https://doi.org/10.31764/historis.vXiY.3432
Asigigan, S. I., & Samur, Y. (2021). The effect of gamified stem practices on students’ intrinsic motivation, critical thinking disposition levels, and perception of problem-solving skills. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(2), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.1157
Bejar, I. I. (2017). A Historical Survey of Research Regarding Constructed-Response Formats. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58689-2_18
Bryan, L., & Guzey, S. S. (2020). K-12 STEM Education: An Overview of Perspectives and Considerations. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v1i1.5
Care, E., Kim, H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education system alignment for 21st century skills Focus on assessment Optimizing Assessment For All 1 Education system alignment for 21st century skills: Focus on assessment.
Cholifah, C., Alves, D. A., Junaedi, I., & Kurniasih, A. W. (2025). Systematic Literature Review: Model Challenge Based Learning Mengunakan Pendekatan Etnomatematika Sebagai Bentuk Kontribusi Pada Pendidikan Berkualitas. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 85–92.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Dewi, S. N., & Sutriyani, W. (2024). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics) terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(7), 2752–2759.
Diana, N., Yohannes, & Sukma, Y. (2021). The effectiveness of implementing project-based learning (PjBL) model in STEM education: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012146
Efendi, C. S., Apriliska, S., Priangka, N. A., & Kurniati, N. (2025). Systematic Literature Review: Faktor Internal Yang Memengaruhi Literasi Matematika Siswa di Indonesia. Juni 2025 Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 5. https://mathjournal.unram.ac.id/index.php/Griya/indexGriya
ElSayary, A. (2021). Transdisciplinary STEAM Curriculum Design and Authentic Assessment in Online Learning: A Model of Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Affective Domains. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3), 493–511.
Fakhrudin, I. A., Probosari, R. M., Indriyani, N. Y., Khasanah, A. N., & Utami, B. (2023). Implementasi pembelajaran STEM dalam kurikulum merdeka: Pemetaan kesiapan, hambatan dan tantangan pada guru SMP. RESONA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Masyarakat, 7(1), 71–81.
Fanni, A. T., Sari, F. L., Lia, L., Prasetiyo, A. N., & Sari, N. H. M. (2023). The Integrasi Etno-STEM Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Materi Aljabar Linier. Santika: Seminar Nasional Tadris Matematika, 3, 47–56.
Fayanto, S., Erniwati, E., & Sabilu, M. (2023). Analysis of the Inquiry Learning Model with ICT Support for Science Learning: A Literature Review. Proceedings Series of Educational Studies, 153–169.
Ichsan, I., Suharyat, Y., Santosa, T. A., & Satria, E. (2023). Effectiveness of STEM-Based Learning in Teaching 21 st Century Skills in Generation Z Student in Science Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2517
Idrus, S. W. Al. (2022). Implementasi STEM Terintegrasi Etnosains (Etno-STEM) di Indonesia: Tinjauan Meta Analisis. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i4.879
Ihrig, L. M., Lane, E., Mahatmya, D., & Assouline, S. G. (2018). STEM excellence and leadership program: Increasing the level of STEM challenge and engagement for high-achieving students in economically disadvantaged rural communities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(1), 24–42.
Kemendikbudristek. (2021). Buku saku rapor pendidikan Indonesia untuk satuan pendidikan: rapot pendidikan indentifikasi, refleksi, benahi. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan.
Kurniasari, R., Ridho, S., & Rini Indriyanti, D. (2023). Analysis of the STEM-Based Blended Project Based Learning Model to Improve Students’ Science Literacy. Journal of Innovative Science Education Ris Kurniasari et al. / Journal of Innovative Science Education, 12(1), 27. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise
Manoharan, M., & Kaur, B. (2023). Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions of Diagrams. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(4), 1315–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10312-3
Nikmatin Mabsutsah, & Yushardi, Y. (2022). Analisis Kebutuhan Guru terhadap E Module Berbasis STEAM dan Kurikulum Merdeka pada Materi Pemanasan Global. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA, 12(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i2.588
Nugraha, A. K., & Rochman, C. (2024). Mapping Research Trends In Teaching And Learning Trajectories In Science Learning. Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 14(1), 63–84.
Nurmaliah, C., Azmi, T. N., & Artika, W. (2021). The impact of implementation of STEM integrating project-based learning on students’ problem-solving abilities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012162.
Nuryana, A., Pawito, P., & Utari, P. (2019). Pengantar metode penelitian kepada suatu pengertian yang mendalam mengenai konsep fenomenologi. Ensains Journal, 2(1), 19–24.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Rahayu, C., Setiani, W. R., Yulindra, D., & Azzahra, L. (2025). Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia dalam Pembelajaran Mendalam (Deep Learning): Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung, 13(1), 9–25.
Rahmawati, L., Juandi, D., & Nurlaelah, E. (2022). Implementasi STEM dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 2002.
Rifandi, R., & Rahmi, Y. L. (2019). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: a literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 012208.
Safitri, E. M., Wahyuni, S., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Menggunakan Aplikasi Quizizz Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA SMP. Quantum: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 14(1), 96–106.
Sari, M. S., Sunarmi, Sulasmi, E. S., & Mawaddah, K. (2019). Formative assessment in project-based learning: Supporting alternative on the learning outcome of biology students in university. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2120(1), 060009.
Sartika, D., Silviana, D., & Syarifuddin, S. (2023). Implementasi Pendekatan Steam Berbasis PjBL Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Pembelajaran Matematika. EL-Muhbib Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Pendidikan Dasar, 7(1), 108–118.
Sheth, M., & Pathak, R. (2023). STEM education: an interdisciplinary and integrated approach of teaching. Interdisciplinary Approaches and Strategies for Sustainable Development, 80–87.
Suryani, A. W., & Utami, H. (2020). Rigour in Qualitative Studies: Are we on track? Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 22(2), 47–58.
Suwardi, S. (2021). Stem (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Inovasi Dalam Pembelajaran Vokasi Era Merdeka Belajar Abad 21. PAEDAGOGY: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Psikologi, 1(1), 40–48.
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., & Mourey, F. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54.
Tomko, M., Aleman, M., Newstetter, W., Linsey, J., & Nagel, R. (2021). A methodological roadmap for phenomenologically based interviewing in Engineering Education: Identifying types of learning in makerspaces. Studies in Engineering Education, 2(1).
Vijayalakshmi, M., Patil, P., & Karikatti, G. (2022). Effective Assessment Strategies for Project-Based Learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 154–160.
Vika Puji Cahyani, Achmad Romadin, Erniyani, Fahri Anwar, & Mohd Zulfakar Mohd Nawi. (2024). Optimising Assessment in Project-Based Learning to Improve the Quality of STEM Learning. International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research, 2(11), 1645–1656. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsmr.v2i11.12392
Wati, P., Nusantara, T., & Utama, C. (2024). Efektivitas PjBL-STEM Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(2), 126–143.
Zihan, Z. (2024). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika (Jipm), 2(1), 60–63.
